Introduction
Innopac Millennium Web Management Reports
What is the Millennium report function called Analyze Patron Searches?
Although this report applies more to the catalogers than to acquisitions staff, Patron Searches is fascinating for anyone interested in what people look for when they sit down to the OPAC. The Searches report include our 3 campus libraries.
The online resources for Analyze Patron Searches are the same. Innovative Interfaces [http://www.iii.com] and a separate web site called CSDirect. http://csdirect.iii.com/index.php. Use of CSDirect requires a login and password which can be given to staff and must not be shared outside the department. To keep up to date with changes CSDirect’s home page provides links for Twitter, a Blog, and a Wiki.
The main screen for Analyze Patron Searches lists these options for viewing patron searches:
Report Options on the left-hand column
Search Statistics
Indexes Used and Search Results
Terminals Used for Search
Clear Search History
View Current Searches
Limit Terminals Reported On
Reload Search History
Of the 7 report options, the following list of 4 would not be used by anyone in technical services; my opinion at the present time. My reason for this may best be explained by what each option does:
Terminals Used for Search — there are 6 terminals from which to select but I don’t know how this correlates with actual machines which could be serving off-campus users, in the library, etc.; this display has little value for the cataloger;
Clear Search History — Jim Hutchens has emphasized to me that I should never do this.
Limit Terminals Reported On — like “Terminals Used for Search” this display has little value for the cataloger;
Reload Search History — I don’t dare click on this!
Of some interest is the report, View Current Searches which is a real time picture of searches which updates itself continually. This option has some value for the cataloger who wants a snAnalyze Patron Searcheshot of current activity.
Let’s get on to 2 reports that have value for us, Search Statistics and Indexes Used and Search Results. This dated display tracks searches for one month. Search Statistics gives cumulative numbers on search activity. The box below illustrates my point.
Management Information on Public Catalog Searches |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each blue “Number of…” is clickable to view a numerical range breakdown of the results retrieved.
The juice of Analyze Patron Searches is in selecting “Indexes Used.” The box below illustrates.
Management Information on Public Catalog Searches |
|
|
Indexes Used and Search Results |
From Thursday September 24 03:03AM, to Friday October 23 03:00AM |
|
Number Done |
Percent Done |
RECORD NUMBERS |
4,890 |
4.32% |
KEYWORDS |
9 |
0.01% |
KEYWORDS |
48,200 |
42.61% |
KEYWORDS |
1,949 |
1.72% |
AUTHORS |
7,421 |
6.56% |
BARCODES |
180 |
0.16% |
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NOS |
5,409 |
4.78% |
SUBJECTS |
10,269 |
9.08% |
DEWEY CALL NUMBERS |
314 |
0.28% |
LOCAL CALL NUMBERS |
231 |
0.20% |
GOVT DOC NUMBERS |
12 |
0.01% |
ISN’S |
6,711 |
5.93% |
MeSH HEADINGS |
248 |
0.22% |
SuDocs CALL NUMBERS |
77 |
0.07% |
NLM CALL NUMBERS |
235 |
0.21% |
OCLC NUMBERS |
4,918 |
4.35% |
PROF/TA |
23 |
0.02% |
GENRE HEADINGS |
223 |
0.20% |
COURSES |
27 |
0.02% |
TITLES |
19,260 |
17.03% |
CHILDREN’S HEADINGS |
349 |
0.31% |
Other |
2,165 |
1.91% |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
113,120 |
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
Again, each blue “Index name…” is clickable to view a numerical range breakdown of the results retrieved.
I chose the Subject Index for these results: In the lower box, Display Actual Searches Input by User, we can extract a month long picture, often running more than 250 screens, of entry by entry ……….
|
|
Search Results for User Keyed Searches – SUBJECTS |
From Wednesday September 23 03:02AM, to Thursday October 22 03:00AM |
|
Number Done |
Percent Done |
Searches Retrieving 1 Record |
7,051 |
68.81% |
Searches Retrieving 2 to 8 Records |
474 |
4.63% |
Searches Retrieving 9 to 30 Records |
351 |
3.43% |
Searches Retrieving 31 to 99 Records |
362 |
3.53% |
Searches Retrieving 100 to 499 Records |
437 |
4.26% |
Searches Retrieving 500 to 4999 Records |
309 |
3.02% |
Searches Retrieving 5000 or More Records |
36 |
0.35% |
|
|
|
Total Searches Retrieving Records |
9,020 |
88.03% |
Total Records Retrieved/Average per Search |
1,056,478 |
117 |
Searches With No Retrievals |
1,227 |
11.97% |
Total Searches |
10,247 |
100.00% |
|
|
|
The box within the box gives the cataloger information of great value; we will find out the successes as well as the failures of real searches. Knowing this, we have the option to create additional cross-references. We can best prepare such cross-references by consultation with public services personnel as well as other catalogers. A guide of hints for successful searching, especially the difference between using a keyword or a Library of Congress subject search, would also be a useful by product of Analyze Patron Searches.
Please ask me any question you might have about this topic, as I am still learning, I would welcome the opportunity to answer you.
The End.